指导单位:北京万融教育管理研究院 万方科技学院
设为首页 | 收藏本站 | 联系我们
 
首页    期刊导航    范文数据库    最新征稿通知    期刊百科与写作常识    办理流程    汇款方式    关于我们    联系我们
 
搜索:
  万融论文发表服务中心 权威 专业 诚信 快捷 竭诚为广大读者服务,为学术创新和期刊出版业发展服务 稿件咨询电话:13693011947  
 
账 号:
密 码:

验证码:

点击这里给我发消息 点击这里给我发消息
点击这里给我发消息 点击这里给我发消息
 教育期刊
教育期刊    
 经管期刊
教育期刊    
 社科综合期刊
社科综合期刊    
 医药期刊
医药期刊    
 农林期刊
农林期刊    
 科技期刊
科技期刊    
 政法期刊
政法期刊    
 文学艺术期刊
文学艺术期刊    
 计算机期刊
计算机期刊    
 其它期刊
其它期刊    
 
 
 
        万融权威期刊网 >> 范文数据库 >>

如何写好EI、SCI期刊顶级学术论文

发布人: 浏览 1536 次【字号 】 发布时间:2012年2月11日 打印本页

    
 
最重要的九点:
1、技术贡献、证据
2、切忌打击面太广、针对的问题多,切入点不能超过2个
3、知道你的敌人是谁
4、选题
5、实验结果、说服力
6、好的前言
7、相关工作、引用(该期刊)
8、修改文章(详细说明各点)
9、宽容态度、坚韧不拔
  
九条信息最重要
1、注意你的贡献,说明你的证据
2、idea有两种:
----Your technique solves a problem for the first time第一次,在某一点上第一次,革命性的,创造性的
----如果不是第一次,Your technique performs better,in one or more of the the following dimensions:
1)Behaviour 效果比他好
2)Coverage 覆盖面广
3)Efficiency 速度快、占用空间少
4)Useability:Users find X easier to use than its rivals 使用方便
You should avoid claiming too many dimensions but one or two with in-depth evidence.
技术贡献不能多,要针对性,更深入。做得更加深入,切忌打击面广,别人反驳更多。
 
 
论文的架构(typical structure of a research paper):
title: Catchy and indicative of your research contribution
       Catchy 引入注目    indicative 特殊性
    题目越长,被拒的可能性越高:例如:爱因斯坦提出“相对论”,就三个字,接下来就是“相对论的能量公式”字多了
    indicative----说文章的大意,不要太抽象。例如:计算理论---太抽象了
 
abstract:A summary of the research problem,your chaim,and the evidence
        以上三部分
 
introduce:将abstract中的A summary 的两三句话展开
        1)motivation 动机
        2)significance 意义
        3)an outline of the rest of the paper
        Related work:
        1) A critical review 评判 几大典型算法,各存在什么问题
        2)我们的方法对于第一类问题怎么解决,对于第二类问题怎么解决
        (批判别人,显出自己)
主编看摘要、前言就基本判决
 
Problem statement and algorithm design:Explain your ideas in detail
 
Evaluation:evidence to support the claim of your research contribution
        ---unless you can provide proofs for a theoretical on theorems,experimental results and              always expected
 
Conclusion:画龙点睛、说你发出文章之后,此刻正在做的,接下来要做的,实验中还有哪些值得接着做的。
 
 
How to write and publish Research papers for the premier forums
 
国外期刊没有长度限制,这是和国内的期刊,例如“计算机学报”有区别
 
what to know and how to write a top-quality paper
前言最重要,能给审稿人留下印象,就是成功的一半了
1、A promising topic (一个有前途的主题)
2、A convincing case (让人信服的例证)
3、In-depth analysis of empirical results(经验结果的深度分析(例如,经验值、参数的设定))
4、the most important part:the introduction (最重要的部分,前言)
 
 
Scientific Paper的撰写(这类论文需要有自己的想法,不是综述文章,如review)
 
Why write a scientific paper
1、Advance knowledge in your research field with evidence 有证据表明,在你研究的领域有了提高/前进
2、Explain your ideas and make them accessible to others 介绍你的主意,使他人理解
3、Two key components in a research paper
--An explicit claim on your contribution on a research problem
针对某个研究问题,直接陈述你的贡献(自己做的工作要写出来)
--Your contribution can possibly be a refutation of a hypothesis on the research problem
针对某个研究问题,你的贡献有可能被通过假设来驳斥。例如:你这么做,会不会造成数据丢失(在数据挖掘领域)
 
光有想法不行,要证明你的想法正确
  
 What to know before you write
1.考虑读者是谁:根据所投的期刊
To whom are you writing?why will they be reading your writing?
 
2.Assess the purpose:What should the reader take away?
让读者带走什么
 
3.Read other people's writing from the forums that you are targeting
从要投的那个期刊上去找相关文章参考
 
4.Know your enemy:Check who are on the program committee or editorial board,and cite their relevant work with due credit
找编委的文章来参考,毕竟他们在这领域很牛
 
5.Follow the rules----length limits,formatting standards,etc
                投会议,长度多长,可能自动放入一堆,直到截至时,才告诉你论文过长
 
choose a promising topic
与外国教授(有名的)交流,看他们的论文,问他们在这方面有什么新的进展,是否有往下做的可能
 
10 challenging problems
-----How to present a convincing case?
-----How are your ideas significant (to justify a paper)?
-----Some ideas are so simple that have been used many times W/O being published.
-----Is all related work referenced and reviewed?
    要与主流的方法进行比较
-----Are the comparative studies with previous work convincing?
----Have your system been implemented and used,and if so what did it demonstrate from the real world.
-----Enough details for your experiment setting.(so that other researchers can verify and improve your results)
-----What were the alternatives considered at various points of your experiments?Why and how have you made the choices for your experiments?
(让别人直到你各种实验参数设置都考虑到了)
 consistent and conclusive 一致性和总结性
-----Can you fine-tune some key parameters to get better or worse results?If so,use figures and tables to show their impacts on your system performances
 公平比较,要别人最佳的情况进行比较
 
------How do the experimental results correspond to the motivation of the paper?
------What have you found surprising and tried to avoid in these experiments?How generally applicable are these lessons?
如果论文是8页纸,那么4页是做实验的。
------The 1/3-2/3 Rule from a reviewer's perspective.
    如果论文是8页纸,那么前言占1页
1) 1/3 time to read your introduction and make a decision
2) Remaining 2/3 time to find evidence for the decision
 
-----A good introduction with a good motivation is half of your success.
    what to cover in the introduction
    ----The research problem
    ----The movivation of your research on the research problem
    ----The claim of your contribution
 
-----A summary of your evidence to support your claim
-----The significance of your contribution
-----An outline of the rest of the paper
Most important of all:the uniqueness of you research in the field!
 
最佳投稿方式:
首先投顶级的会议,若被录用,则对论文进行扩展,在题名上加“*”,说明:论文缩写版已经被某国际会议录用,投国际期刊
 
这么做好处:1、让编审注意,这篇论文已经在国际会议上录用,说明有价值,值得细看;
        2、防止一稿多投。提前告诉
 
 
Your work has to be
(1)technically sound
(2)relevant
(3)original
(4)significant
 
起死回生(文章被拒之后)
期刊----(题目,摘要)---主编---》副编-听取意见-》审稿人(reviewers)
 
会议-----主席--》副主席---》程序主席---》程序委员会(一般为审稿人)
 
如何处理返回意见(How to deal with handling Editors)
1.有礼貌 Be polite,but to the point
2.Ask for a change,if a clearly unfair case
把副主编换了,告诉主编,让别的副主编来审稿,只要你有道理
 
如果有3个人审稿,2个人认为不好,则不行。如果一个说好,一个说不好,对比,比较他们的意见
 
----Try every effort to address every concert
提供他们点对点的修改意见
 
有的审稿者的意见不能从
Use other reviewers's comments to disagree with the regative ones
 
How to deal with "arregant" and "ignorant" reviewers
---if there is no chance to win them over,provide a gentle statement for the "unreasonable"criticisms that you are not addressing
---You should still try and resolve some of their comments
---your attitude towards the reviewers' comments is important
----all reviewers will read your statement of changes,and an accommodating approach is useful.
 
 
 
我们的方法虽然简单,几百年来人们都知道的,但是没人提。但是在各个领域都很有重要。提到重要性
  
Data mining
-knowledge discovery in databases(KDD)
-intelligent data analysis
Database systems
-Data management
Knowledge Engineering
-soft computing
三大顶级会议   KDD=IEEE ICDM > SIAM-DM
Journals(top journals VS high-impact journals)
-Data Mining and knowledge discovery
-knowledge and information systems
-IEEE Transactions on knowledge and Data Engineering
博士(美国佛蒙特大学*系正教授和系主任,TKDE等多种国际著名学术杂志的主编和编委)  
,,


   
 
 首页 | 关于我们 | 联系我们 | 版权声明 | 办理流程  
 
Copyright@ 2012 万融数据论文发表服务中心 All Rights Reserved. 网站备案:京ICP备12001766号